Being in Crisis: Scenes of Blindness and Insight in Tragedy

Kate Katafiasz

Abstract


Tragedy was considered ‘highly serious, political (in some sense)—and religious’, at its origin in Athens in 427 BCE (Winnington-Ingram, 1989: 5). In spite of its centuries-old existence the trope still troubles theatre and performance philosophy scholars. As Simon Critchley (2017) recently put it: ‘What kind of hedonism is the pleasure we take in tragedy, which depicts not just suffering and death, but the ghostly porosity of the frontier separating the living from the dead?’ (37). This paper makes use of, and critiques Critchley’s scholarship. It explores his notion of tragedy’s porous frontier in relation to the skene, the boundary that bisected the ancient stage and restricted audience vision at critical moments in the drama. The paper links the skene functionally to other such pivotal boundaries or ‘scenes’, to generate an interdisciplinary range of approaches to the precarious experience of having sight and hearing momentarily dislocated from each other. In the process the paper contests Critchley’s Platonic concerns about tragedy’s deceptive and sadistic inflections, to offer an entirely new take on the ancient art form; one which may shed fresh light on Performance Philosophy’s foundational debates concerning the use, or demolition, of boundaries.

Keywords


Drama, Psychoanalysis, Lacanian Desire, Pleasure,

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Althusser, Louis. 1971. ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation)’. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Translated by Ben Brewster, 127–86. New York: Monthly Review.

Artaud, Antonin. (1932) 1986. ‘The Theatre of Cruelty’. In The Theory of the Modern Stage. Edited by Eric Bentley, 55–75. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Brecht, Bertolt. (1945) 1986. ‘The Street Scene’. In The Theory of the Modern Stage. Edited by Eric Bentley, 85–96, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Critchley, Simon. 2017. ‘Tragedy’s Philosophy’. In Performing Antagonism. Edited by Tony Fisher and Eve Katsouraki, 25–43. London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/978–1-349–95100–0_2

Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1987. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Translated by Kathleen Blamey. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chandler, Daniel. 2002. Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166277

Dolar, Mladen. 2006. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Euripides. (416BCE) 1997. Herakles. In Plays: 5. Translated by Kenneth McLeish. London: Methuen.

Freud, Sigmund. (1899) 1997. The Interpretation of Dreams. Translated by A. A. Brill. Ware: Wordsworth.

Freud, Sigmund. (1919) 2003. The Uncanny. Translated by David McLintock. London: Penguin.

Freud, Sigmund. (1920) 2006. ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle’. In The Penguin Freud Reader. Edited by Adam Phillips, 132–195. London: Penguin.

Gould, John. 1989. ‘Tragedy in Performance’. In Greek Drama. Edited by P. E. Easterling and B.M.W. Knox, 6–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Howland, Jacob. 2000. ‘Xenophon’s Philosophic Odyssey’. American Political Science Review 94 (4): 875–889. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586213

Lacan, Jacques. 1998. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Norton.

Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Écrits. Translated by Bruce Fink. London: Norton.

Minick, N.J. 2005. ‘The Development of Vygotski’s Thought’. In An Introduction to Vygotski. Edited by Harry Daniels, 32–56. London: Routledge.

Plato. (c. 385–370 BCE) 2005. The Symposium. Translated by Christopher Gill. London: Penguin.

Smith, John. 1969. ‘Time, Times, and the Right Time’. The Monist Philosophy of History 53 (1): 1–13.

Whitford, Margaret. 2006. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine. London: Routledge.

Winnington-Ingram, R.P. 1989. ‘The Origins of Tragedy’. In Greek Drama. Edited by P. E. Easterling and B.M.W. Knox, 1–6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zupančič, Alenka. 2008. The Odd One In. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Žižek, Slavoj. 1999. ‘The Spectre of Ideology’. In The Žižek Reader. Edited by Elisabeth and Edmund Wright, 53–86. Oxford: Blackwell.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2018.41199

Copyright (c) 2018 Kate Katafiasz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.