Missing the Wrong Target: On Andrew Bowie’s Rejection of the Philosophy of Music

Tomas McAuley

Abstract


Andrew Bowie rejects the philosophy of music. He does so because it (allegedly) objectifies music and because it (allegedly) only ever affirms the practitioner’s prior philosophical assumptions. I argue that Bowie’s rejection is illegitimate on two counts. First, he mischaracterises the philosophy of music. I show how. Second, even if his characterisation of the philosophy of music were a faithful representation of that discipline, his reasons for rejecting it would still not be sufficient. In particular, Bowie criticises the philosophy of music for not engaging properly with its ‘other’ (music), yet refuses to engage seriously with his own ‘other’ (the philosophy of music). Bowie aims for the wrong target – and misses anyway.


Full Text:

HTML PDF

 

Cited by:

1. James Tartaglia. 2016. "Jazz-Philosophy Fusion." Performance Philosophy 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2016.2162

References


Alperson, Philip. 1984. “On Musical Improvisation.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (1): 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/430189.

Bowie, Andrew. (1990) 2003. Aesthetics and Subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. 2nd edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Bowie, Andrew. 2007. Music, Philosophy, and Modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bowie, Andrew. 2015. “The ‘Philosophy of Performance’ and the Performance of Philosophy.” Performance Philosophy 1: 51-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.21476/PP.2015.1131.

Currie, James. 2008. Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews: An Electronic Journal. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/23563/?id=13328.

Dammann, Guy. 2008. Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (4): 459-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayn036.

Davies, Stephen. 2012. The Artful Species: Aesthetics, Art, and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Garratt, James. 2010. Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. Music & Letters 91 (3): 429-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcq027.

Goehr, Lydia. 2009. “Normativity without Norms.” Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4): 597-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00388.x.

Gracyk, Theodore. 1996. Rhythm and Noise: An Aesthetics of Rock. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

Hagberg, Garry. 2009. “Jazz Improvisation and Ethical Interaction: A Sketch of the Connections.” In Art and Ethical Criticism, edited by Garry Hagberg, 258-85. Oxford: Blackwell.

Khalifa, Kareem. 2009. Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3): 481-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.0.0127.

Kivy, Peter. 1993. The Fine Art of Repetition: Essays in the Philosophy of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kivy, Peter. 1995. Authenticities: Philosophical Reflections on Musical Performance. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

Levinson, Jerrold. 1990. Music, Art, and Metaphysics: Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. Reprinted New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Levinson, Jerrold. 2012. “Popular Song as Moral Microcosm: Life Lessons from Jazz Standards.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 71: 51-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1358246112000264.

Ridley, Aaron. 2004. The Philosophy of Music: Theme and Variations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Robinson, Jenefer. 2005. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. New York: Oxford University Press.

Thom, Paul. 1993. For An Audience: A Philosophy of the Performing Arts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Zangwill, Nick. 2014. “Friends Reunited: Susan McClary and Musical Formalism.” The Musical Times (Winter): 63-69.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21476/PP.2015.1126

Copyright (c) 2015 Tomas McAuley

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.