Interruption—Intervention: On the interval between literature and music in Jean Luc Nancy’s “Myth Interrupted”

Daniel Villegas Vélez

Abstract


This paper focuses on the role of mimesis and more specifically, the role of musical performance in creating communities by examining the oscillations between muthos and logos that inform contemporary thinking around community and institutions.

The starting point is Jean-Luc Nancy’s (1991) intervention—or interruption— into the totalitarian or “immanentist” tendency of myth, a tendency that is especially at play in European modernity’s image of itself as a myth-less community as well as in contemporary or “(new) fascism” (Lawtoo 2019). For Nancy, the notion of myth must not be rejected but “interrupted,” so that “there is a voice of community articulated in the interruption, and even out of the interruption itself” (1991). What replaces myth in his account is “literature” a notion that arguably informs the contemporary movement of performance philosophy (Corby 2015).

Why literature and not musical performance? In posing this question, this paper turns back to ancient Greek mousikē as a sonorous performance that interrupts the interruption, giving rise to the interval. Countering the myth of myth, I develop an account of mousikē that mobilizes rhythm, spacing, and iterability to suggest a notion of community that exchanges communion for performative communication, producing an intervened institution interrupted from within: an in— stitution.


Keywords


deconstruction; performativity; music theory; politics; mimesis

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Baraka, Amiri. 2010. Black Music: Essays. Brooklyn: Akashic.

Barker, Andrew. 1984. Greek Musical Writings: Volume 1, The Musician and his Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barker, Andrew. 2004. Greek Musical Writings: Volume 2, Harmonic and Acoustic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Corby, James. 2015. “The Contemporary Quarrel Between Performance and Literature? Reflections on Performance (and) Philosphy.” Performance Philosophy 1: 36–50. https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2015.1112

Esposito, Roberto. 2011. Immunitas: The Protection And Negation Of Life. English edn. Cambridge: Polity.

Gebauer, Gunter, and Christoph Wulf. 1995. Mimesis: Culture—Art—Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gülgönen, Séline. 2014. “La mimesis musicale dans les Dialogues platoniciens.” Phoenix 68 (1/2): 97–111. http://doi.org/10.7834/phoenix.68.1-2.0097

Havelock, Eric. 1963. Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hyer, Brian, and Ryan Minor. 2006. “A Note from the Guest Editors.” The Opera Quarterly 22 (2): 205–207, 392–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/oq/kbl007

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. 1989. Typography: Mimesis, Philosophy, Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. 1994. Musica Ficta: Figures of Wagner. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, and Jean-Luc Nancy. 1988. The Literary Absolute: The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, and Jean-Luc Nancy. 1990. “The Nazi Myth.” Critical Inquiry 16 (2): 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/448535

Lawtoo, Nidesh. 2013. The Phantom of the Ego: Modernism and the Mimetic Unconscious. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

Lawtoo, Nidesh. 2019. (New) Fascism: Contagion, Community, Myth. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. https://doi.org/10.14321/j.ctvj4swcr

Lawtoo, Nidesh. 2019. “Violence and the Mimetic Unconscious (Part Two): The Contagious Hypothesis: Plato, Affect, Mirror Neurons.” Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture 26: 123–160. https://doi.org/10.14321/contagion.26.2019.0123

McKeane, John. 2015. Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe: (Un)Timely Meditations. New York: Modern Humanities Research Association and Routledge.

Nagy, Gregory. 1996. Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1991. The Inoperative Community. Edited by Peter Connor. Translated by Peter Connor, Lisa Garbus, Michael Holland, and Simona Sawhney. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1997. The Muses. Translated by Peggy Kamuf. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2007. Listening. Translated by Charlotte Mandell. New York: Fordham University Press.

Ochoa Gautier, Ana María. 2014. Aurality: Listening and Knowledge in Nineteenth-Century Colombia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376262

Rama, Angel. 1996. The Lettered City. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Stiegler, Bernard. 1998. Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Translated by Richard Beardsworth and George Collins. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Taussig, Michael. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. New York and London: Routledge.

Villegas Vélez, Daniel. 2018. “The Matter of Timbre.” The Oxford Handbook of Timbre. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190637224.013.20.

Wersinger, Anne Gabrièle. 2001. Platon et la dysharmonie: recherches sur la forme musicale. Paris: Vrin.Biography.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2020.52277

Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Villegas Vélez

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.