Beuys’ Chair and the Violence of the Other: Toward a Theory of Aesth-ethics
Keywords:
Beuys, violence, hospitality, phenomenology, aesthetics, ethics,Abstract
Most rare are those works of art that, in a simple visual gesture, succeed in formulating a dilemma that occupies culture as a whole. Such is the artwork of Joseph Beuys entitled Fat Chair. The work—viewed mainly from a phenomenological perspective—is comprised of two elements holding a tension: a chair on the one hand, and a lump of fat placed on top of it on the other. The tension between these elements, so the article argues, manifests the tension between two types of violence: following Benjamin, these are termed “the violence of the Father” and “the violence of the Other” (or in Hebrew, “the Violence of ha-Rav”). The violence of the Father refers mainly to the violence of culture: the violence of the concept and the category from the side of the object, and the violence of the law/name of the Father from the side of the subject. The violence of the Other, transgressing distinctions between good and evil and subject and object, is the violence of the pre-cultural and the primordial, before law and language. This primal violence cannot appear in its full presence, either in culture in general or in art in particular; it can only appear as a leftover and a spectre. Beuys' artwork manifests this aporetic appearance in a paradigmatic manner, and in this sense, it could serve as a paradigm for the possibility of hospitality in art. In fact, the article opens the way for an argument of a larger scale, according to which art, and not the social sphere—as Levinas maintains—should be viewed as the sphere of the hospitality of the entirely Other. The study of such hospitality in art should therefore be termed “Aesth-ethics.”
References
Bataille, George. 2013. Story of the eye. Translated by Joachim Neugroschel. London: Penguin.
Benjamin, Walter. 1986. ‘Critique of violence. In Reflections: Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings, edited by Peter Demetz, translated by Edmund Jephcott, 277–300. New York: Schocken.
Derrida, Jacques. 1982. ‘Différance’. In Margins of philosophy, translated by Alan Bass. 1–27. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 1992. ‘Force of law: The “mystical foundation of authority”.’ In Deconstruction and the possibility of justice, edited by Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David G. Carlson, 3–67. New York and London: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx: The state of debt, the work of mourning and the new international. Translated by Peggy Kamuf. New York and London: Routledge.
Freud, Sigmund. 1950. Totem and taboo. Translated by James Strachey. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Heidegger, Martin. (1942/1943) 1982. Parmenides, Gesamtausgabe, 54. Frankfurt a. M: V. Klostermann.
Kant, Immanuel (1783) 2004. Prolegomena to Any future metaphysics: That will be able to come forward as science. Translated by Gary Hatfield. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808517
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lacan, Jacques. 1992. The seminar of Jacques Lacan: The ethics of psychoanalysis, 1959–1960 Book VII. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller. Translated by Dennis Porter. London: Routledge.
Lacan, Jacques. 1993. The seminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud’s papers on technique, 1953–1954 Book I. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller. Translated by John Forrester. New York and London: W. W. Norton.
Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Ecrits: The first complete edition in English. Translated by Bruce Fink, Héloįse Fink and Russell Grigg. New York: W.W. Norton.
Lauf, Cornelia. 1992. Joseph Beuys: The pedagogue as persona. Ph D diss., Columbia University.
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1979. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. ‘Reality and its shadow.’ In Collected philosophical papers, translated by Alphonso Lingis, 1–15. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4364-3_1
Taylor, Mark C. 2012. Refiguring the spiritual: Beuys, Barney, Turrell, Goldsworthy. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/tayl15766
Tisdall, Caroline. 1998. Joseph Beuys: We go this way. London: Violette Editions.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Dror Pimentel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
