Immanence in Physics

Authors

  • Tanja Traxler University of Vienna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2017.33146

Keywords:

physics, immanence, Deleuze, space, complementarity, physical space

Abstract

In this article, the conceptual history of space in physics will be presented in the context of transcendent and immanent concepts. In short, transcendent concepts postulate space as an ambient super-structure to organize material objects, while in immanent concepts space does not exist apart from objects but emerges through their relations. In this analysis it becomes apparent that transcendent characterizations of space have been dominant in physics during the past centuries, while immanent conceptions of space have come to the fore only since the development of the general theory of relativity. The importance of immanence in physics besides relativity is still lacking. In contrast to the classical framework of absolute and relative accounts of space, the notions of transcendence and immanence allow for a complementary conception of space which combines elements of both.

Author Biography

Tanja Traxler, University of Vienna

Tanja Traxler is PhD-student and university lecturer at the faculty of physics of the University of Vienna. Her interdisciplinary thesis ‘Entanglement in space—philosophical considerations on space and bodies in quantum physics’ (working title), is—together with the doctoral theses of Louise Beltzung Horvath and Julia Grillmayr—part of the PhD-project ‘Thinking Space’ (funded by the Austrian Academy of Sciences 2012–2016 through a ‘DOC-team’-grant). Being trained as a theoretical quantum physicist, in her PhD she focuses on philosophical considerations of quantum theory. She has been invited as a visiting research scholar to the University of Twente, Netherlands and to the University of California/Santa Cruz and has presented her work at more than 20 international conferences and workshops. Beside her academic career, she is working as a science editor for the Austrian newspaper Der Standard, mainly in the fields of physics and philosophy.

References

Bohr, Niels. 1928. “The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory.” Nature 121 (3050): 580–590. https://doi.org/10.1038/121580a0

DeLanda, Manuel. 2004. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Continuum.

Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix. (1980) 2005. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Earman, John. 1989. World Enough and Space Time: Absolute versus relational theories of space and time. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Jammer, Max. (1954) 1993. Concepts of Space: The history of theories of space in physics. 3rd enl. ed. New York: Dover.

Kline, Morris. (1972) 1990. Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. New York: Oxford University Press.

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm and Samuel Clarke. (1717) 2007. Exchange of papers between Leibniz and Clarke. Retrieved from http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/leibniz1715_1.pdf

Newton, Isaac. 1729. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Volume 1. Translated by Andrew Motte. London: Benjamin Motte.

Newton, Isaac. (1687) 1846. Newton’s Principia: The mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Translated by Andrew Motte. New York: Daniel Adee.

Nikolaou, Sousanna-Maria. 1998. Die Atomlehre Demokrits und Platons Timaios: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung. Vol. Bd. 112. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.

Olby, Robert C., Geoffrey N. Cantor, John R. R.Christie, and M. Jonathan S. Hodge, eds. 1990. Companion to the History of Modern Science. London and New York: Routledge.

Plotnitsky, Arkady. 2009. “Bernhard Riemann.” In Deleuze’s Philosophical Lineage, edited by Graham Jones and Jon Roffe, 190–208. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Plotnitsky, Arkady. 2012. Niels Bohr and Complementarity: An introduction. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–1-4614–4517–3

Riemann, Bernhard and Jürgen Jost. (1868) 2016. On the Hypotheses which Lie at the Bases of Geometry. Basel: Birkhäuser. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–26042–6

Rynasiewicz, Robert. 2014. “Newton’s views on space, time, and motion.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information, The Metaphysics Research Lab. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/newton-stm/

Saunders, Simon. 2005. “Complementarity and scientific rationality.” Foundations of Physics 35 (3): 417–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701–004–1982-x

Schilpp, Paul Arthur. 2000. Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Vol. 7. New York: MFJ Books.

Suisky, Dieter, ed. 2009. Euler as Physicist. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-540–74865–6

Downloads

Published

21-12-2017

How to Cite

Traxler, T. (2017). Immanence in Physics. Performance Philosophy, 3(3), 766–780. https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2017.33146

Issue

Section

The Concept of Immanence in Contemporary Philosophy and the Arts