Promethean and Posthuman Freedom: Brassier on Improvisation and Time
Keywords:
posthumanism, prometheanism, normative functionalism, speculative aesthetics, cognitive science, Ray BrassierAbstract
Ray Brassier's "Unfree Improvisation/Compulsive Freedom" (written for the 2013 collaboration with Basque noise artist Mattin at Glasgow's Tramway) is a terse but insightful discussion of the notion of freedom in improvisation. He argues that we should view freedom not as the determination of an act from outside the causal order, but as the reflective self-determination by action within the causal order. This requires a system that acts in conformity to rules but can represent and modify these rules with implications for its future behaviour.
Brassier does not provide a detailed account of how self-determination works in improvisation. His text implies that the act of improvisation involves an encounter between rule-governed rationality and idiomatic patterns or causes but does not specify how such rules operate in music, what their nature is or how the encounter between rules and more rudimentary “pattern-governed” behaviour occurs.
I will argue that, in any case, there are no such rules to be had. Instead, claims about what is permissible or implied in musical processes index highly-context sensitive perceptual and affective responses to musical events. I develop this picture in the light of recent accounts of predictive processing and active inference in cognitive science.
This account provides an alternate way of expressing Brassier’s remarks on the relationship between music and history in “Unfree Improvisation” one that eschews normative discourse in favour of an ontology of social and biological assemblages, their affects, and the processes they entrain.
This adjustment is of more than aesthetic interest. Brassier’s text suggests that the temporality of the improvising act models an insurgent relation to time: specifically, the remorseless temporality explored in his writings on Prometheanism and Radical Enlightenment. I will conclude by using use this analogy to elaborate the idea of a posthuman agency adapted to a hypermodern milieu of self-augmenting technological change.
References
Adams, Rick A., Stewart Shipp, and Karl J. Friston. 2013. “Predictions not commands: Active inference in the motor system.” Brain Struct. Funct. 218 (3): 611–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5
Arakawa, Shusaku, and Madeline Gins. 2002. Architectural Body. Birmingham: University of Alabama Press.
Badiou, Alain. 2006. Being and Event. Translated by Oliver Feltham. London: Continuum.
Bakker, Scott. 2014. “Back to Square One: Toward a Post-Intentional Future.” Scientia Salon. Accessed 8 January 2015. https://scientiasalon.wordpress.com/2014/11/05/back-to-square-one-toward-a-post-intentional-future/
Bakker, Scott. 2014. “The Blind Mechanic II: Reza Negarestani and the Labor of Ghosts.” Three Pound Brain. Accessed 30 April 2014. https://rsbakker.wordpress.com/2014/04/13/the-blind-mechanic-ii-reza-negarestani-and-the-labour-of-ghosts
Beaty, Roger E. 2015. “The Neuroscience of Musical Improvisation.” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 51: 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.004
Bersani, Leo. 1986. The Freudian Body: Psychoanalysis and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Brandom, Robert. 2001. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Brassier, Ray. 2007. Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extinction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590823
Brassier, Ray. 2011. “The View from Nowhere.” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture 17: 7–23.
Brassier, Ray. 2013. “Unfree Improvisation/Compulsive Freedom.” Accessed 1 March 1 2015. http://www.mattin.org/essays/unfree_improvisation-compulsive_freedom.htm
Brassier, Ray. 2013. “Nominalism, Naturalism, and Materialism: Sellars' Critical Ontology.” In Contemporary Philosophical Naturalism and its Implications. Edited by Bana Bashour and Hans D. Muller, 101–114. New York: Routledge.
Brassier, Ray. 2014. “Prometheanism and its Critics.” In #Accelerate: The Accelerationist Reader. Edited by R. Mackay and A. Avenessian, 467–488. Falmouth: Urbanomic.
Brassier, Ray, and Marcin Rychter. 2011. “I Am a Nihilist Because I Still Believe in Truth.” Originally in Kronos (March). Accessed 9 May 2015. https://dereklubangakene.wordpress.com/2013/12/08/ray-brassier-i-am-a-nihilist-because-i-still-believe-in-truth/
Bruineberg, Jelle. 2017. “Active Inference and the Primacy of the ‘I Can.” In Philosophy and Predictive Processing. Edited by Thomas Metzinger and Wanja Wiese. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group. Available online at https://predictive-mind.net/papers/active-inference-and-the-primacy-of-the-i-can
Clark, Andy. 2013. “Whatever Next? Predictive brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 36 (3): 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477
Clark, Andy. 2015. Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Debruille, J. Bruno, Mathieu B. Brodeur, and Carolina Franco Porras. 2012. “N300 and social affordances: A study with a real person and a dummy as stimuli.” PLoS ONE: 7 (10): e47922. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047922
DeLanda, Manuel. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
Döring, Sabine A. 2014. “Why Recalcitrant Emotions Are Not Irrational.” In Emotion and Value. Edited by Sabine Roeser and Cain Todd, 124–136. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686094.003.0008
Feldman, Jacob. 2013. “Tuning Your Priors to the World.” Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1): 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12003
Gallagher, S. and Allen, M., 2018. “Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition.” Synthese 195 (6): 2627–2648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1269-8
Hohwy, Jakob. 2013. The Predictive Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001
Huron, David. 2006. Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6575.001.0001
Ireland, Amy. 2016. “Noise: An Ontology of the Avant-garde.” In Aesthetics After Finitude. Edited by Baylee Brits, Prudence Gibson, and Amy Ireland, 217–228. Melbourne: Re.Press.
Johnson, Julian. 1998. “The Nature of Abstraction: Analysis and the Webern Myth.” Music Analysis 17 (3): 267–280. https://doi.org/10.2307/854416
Limb, Charles J., and Allen R. Braun. 2008. “Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation.” PLoS One 3 (2): e1679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001679
Limanowski, Jakub. 2017. “(Dis-)Attending to the Body - Action and Self-Experience in the Active Inference Framework.” In Philosophy and Predictive Processing. Edited by Thomas K. Metzinger and Wanja Wiese, Chapter 18. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958573192
McGuiness, Andy. 2009. Mental and motor representation for music performance. Doctoral dissertation. The Open University.
Negarestani, Reza. 2014. “The Labor of the Inhuman, Part I: Human.” e-flux 52. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/52/59920/the-labor-of-the-inhuman-part-i-human/
Negarestani, Reza. 2014. “The Labor of the Inhuman, Part II: The Inhuman.” e-flux 53. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/53/59893/the-labor-of-the-inhuman-part-ii-the-inhuman/
Namikawa, Jun, Ryunosuke Nishimoto, and Jun Tani. 2011. “A Neurodynamic Account of Spontaneous Behaviour.” PLoS Comput Biol 7 (10): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002221
Roden, David. 2013. “Nature’s Dark Domain: An Argument for a Naturalised Phenomenology.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 72: 169–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135824611300009X
Roden, David. 2014. Posthuman Life: Philosophy at the Edge of the Human. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315744506
Roden, David. 2016. “Letters from the Ocean Terminus.” Dis Magazine. http://dismagazine.com/discussion/81950/letters-from-the-ocean-terminus-david-roden/
Roden, David. 2017. “On Reason and Spectral Machines: Robert Brandom and Bounded Posthumanism.” In Philosophy After Nature. Edited by Rosie Braidotti and Rick Dolphijn, 99¬–119. London: Roman and Littlefield.
Roden, David. 2018. “Disconnection at the limit: posthumanism, deconstruction and non-philosophy.” Symposia Melitensia 14: 19–34.
Rosenberg, Martin E. 2010. “Jazz and Emergence (Part One).” Transversal Fields of Experience, edited by Christoph Brunner, Troy Rhoades, Bianca Scliar, and Janita Wiersma. Special issue of Inflexions 4: 183–277.
Serres, Michel. 2007. The Parasite (Posthumanities). Translated by L. R. Schehr. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Thompson, Marie. 2012. “Productive parasites: thinking of noise as affect.” Cultural Studies Review 18 (3): 13–35. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v18i3.2860
Walton, Ashley E., Michael J. Richardson, Peter Langland-Hassan, and Anthony Chemero. 2015. “Improvisation and the self-organization of multiple musical bodies.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00313
Walton, Ashley E. Walton, Auriel Washburn, Peter Langland-Hassan, Anthony Chemero, Heidi Kloos, and Michael J. Richardson. 2018. “Creating Time: Social Collaboration in Music Improvisation.” Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (1): 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12306
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
