Failing to Think: The Promise of Performance Philosophy
Keywords:Performance, philosophy, Plato, epistemology, German Romanticism, truth, thinking, failure
Performance Philosophy, at its most hopefully imagined, seems to promise to succeed where other philosophical discourses and performative practises have come up short—perhaps even failed. That is to say, far from simply announcing a relatively modest interdisciplinary venture between philosophy and performance, Performance Philosophy seems invested with a radical potential that would, if realised, reveal a paradigm of creation and/or interpretation that is quite new and distinct. Its achievements, if successful, would be beyond the compass of performance and philosophy conceived independently of each other. Even the term itself, ‘Performance Philosophy’, conveys a certain paratactical momentum that seems directed towards a profound artistic, intellectual, and disciplinary miscegenation where neither performance nor philosophy would remain separate and intact and neither would be subordinated to or conditioned by the unchanged disciplinary genealogy and underpinnings of the other. Though exciting in prospect, this is far from unproblematic. Is performance, as an act of deliberate creative expression, not to some degree pulling in the opposite direction to truth-revealing, knowledge-bearing philosophy? Or does Performance Philosophy relate only to more elastic understandings and redefinitions of philosophy? More specifically, this article asks what ‘thinking’ ‘itself’ might be in the context of Performance Philosophy and what sort of ‘knowledge’ it might give rise to. It will be argued that against the usual measures of epistemological success Performance Philosophy must be judged to fail. However it will then explores whether, in a move reminiscent of the aesthetics of failure of early German Romanticism, it is precisely failure that seems to hold the promise of opening up new epistemological ground.
Alexander, Gavin, ed. 2004. Sidney’s ‘The Defence of Poesy’ and Selected Renaissance Literary Criticism. London: Penguin.
Barish, Jonas. 1981. The Antitheatrical Prejudice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Blanchot, Maurice. (1974) 1993. The Infinite Conversation. Translated by Susan Hanson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cave, Terrance. 2016. Thinking with Literature: Towards a Cognitive Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198749417.001.0001
Corby, James. 2015. ‘The Contemporary Quarrel Between Performance and Literature? Reflections on Performance (and) Philosophy.’ Performance Philosophy 1: 36–50. Accessed 19 December 2018. https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2015.1112
Critchley, Simon. 1997. Very Little … Almost Nothing. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203289457
David, Tracy C., ed. 2008. The Cambridge Companion to Performance Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. (1794) 1982. The Science of Knowledge. Translated by Peter Heath and John Lachs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fisher-Lichte, Erika. 2005. Theatre, Sacrifice, Ritual: Exploring Forms of Political Theatre. London and New York: Routledge.
Geuss, Raymond. 2005. Outside Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gourgouris, Stathis. 2003. Does Literature Think? Literature as Theory for an Antimythical Era. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1835) 1975. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Vols. I and II. Translated by T.M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horace. (c. 19 BCE) 1942. Horace: Satires, Epistles and Ars Poetica. Translated by H. Rushton Fairclough. London: William Heinemann Ltd.
Husel, Stephanie. 2013. ‘Watching the(m) Play.’ In How Performance Thinks. Edited by Helen Julia Minors, 87–98. https://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/24472/
Jackson, Shannon. 2011. Social Works. New York and London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852897
Jonson, Ben. (1605) 1998. Volpone and Other Plays. London: Penguin.
Kirkkopelto, Esa. 2015. ‘For What Do We Need Performance Philosophy?’ Performance Philosophy 1: 4–6. https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2015.117
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philipe and Jean-Luc Nancy. 1988 . The Literary Absolute: The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism. Translated by Philip Barnard and Cheryl Lester. New York: State University of New York Press.
Lerner, Ben. 2016. The Hatred of Poetry. London: Fitzcarraldo Editions.
Macherey, Pierre. 1995. The Object of Literature. Translated by David Macey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Novalis. (1802) 1997. Philosophical Writings. Translated by Margaret Mahony Stoljar. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London and New York: Routledge.
Puchner, Martin. 2010. The Drama of Ideas: Platonic Provocations in Theater and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730322.001.0001
Rimpler, Rüdiger H. 2016. ‘Philosophical Performances in Everyday Life Situations.’ Performance Philosophy 2 (1): 23–34. Accessed 19 December 2018. https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2016.2180
Rokem, Freddie. 2010. Philosophers & Thespians: Thinking Performance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. ‘On Denoting.’ Mind 14: 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479
Schlegel, Friedrich. (1799) 1968. Dialogue on Poetry and Literary Aphorisms. Translated by Ernst Behler, Roman Struc. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schlegel, Friedrich. (1798–1800) 1971. Friedrich Schlegel’s Lucinde and the Fragments. Translated by Peter Firchow. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stoppard, Tom. 2006. Rock ‛n’ Roll. London: Faber and Faber.
Williams, Michael. 2001. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).