Anxiety Affect Aliens and Other Non-Paranoid Performances Against Capitalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2019.51254Keywords:
precarity, affect theory, phenomenology, feminist theory, performativity, alienation, assembly, paranoid readingAbstract
In 2014, the Institute for Precarious Consciousness published a number of propositions on the relationship between anxiety, precarity, and neoliberal capitalism. IPC argues that anxiety is the dominant affect of neoliberal capitalism and proposes consciousness-raising circles as a technique for combating anxiety, exposing anxiety as a “public secret,” and ushering in the new anxiety-fighting machine. Heeding the roots of consciousness-raising in feminist movements, this paper puts the IPC’s proposed approach in conversation with affect theory. What is the relationship between neoliberal capitalism and anxiety, and how can anxiety be brought, through performance, into a political phenomenology of the emotions in order to combat capitalism as the dominant ideology? Following Judith Butler’s use of Hannah Arendt’s view of action and simultaneous resistance to Arendt’s division of mind and body in her conception of public and private spheres, I ask: how can embodied techniques (in approaches such as Brechtian alienation and situational choreography) be used in conjunction with speech acts to address precarity’s effects on mind and body? Rather than seeking to subdue anxiety, I argue that breaking the cycle of affect production requires a praxis-based use of alienation, and the supplementation of paranoid approaches to criticism and activism with reparative approaches.
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Arendt, Hannah. (1958) 1998. The Human Condition. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, Hannah. 1968. Men in Dark Times. New York: Harcourt.
Bartky, Sandra. 1990. Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.
Brecht, Bertolt. 1967. Gesammelte Werke in 20 Bänden, ed. Werner Hecht.Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Butler, Judith. 2003. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso.
Butler, Judith. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674495548
Feenstra, Eliot. 2018. Why Does Everyone I Know Feel Anxious?: Hosting Precarity Consciousness-Raising Circles. Self-published.
hooks, bell. 1990. Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. Boston: South End Press.
Horsman, Yasco. 2010. Theaters of Justice : Judging, Staging, and Working Through In Arendt, Brecht, and Delbo. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
The Institute for Precarious Consciousness. 2014. “Anxiety, affective struggle, and precarity consciousness-raising.” Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 6 (2): 271–300.
Markell, Patchen. 2018. “Politics and the Case of Poetry: Arendt on Brecht.” Modern Intellectual History 15: 503–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244316000366
Molé, Noelle J. 2010. “Precarious Subjects: Anticipating Neoliberalism in Northern Italy’s Workplace.” American Anthropologist 112 (1): 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548–1433.2009.01195.x
Nash, Jennifer C. 2011. “Practicing Love: Black Feminism, Love-Politics, and Post-Intersectionality.” Meridians 11 (2): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2979/meridians.11.2.1
Rouse, John. 1984. “Brecht and the Contradictory Actor.” Theatre Journal 36 (1): 25–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207358
Sarachild, Kathie. 1975. “Consciousness-Raising: A Radical Weapon.” In Feminist Revolution, edited by Redstockings, 144–50. New York: Random House.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay Is About You.” In Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, 123–151. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384786-005
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).