Missing the Wrong Target: On Andrew Bowie’s Rejection of the Philosophy of Music
Andrew Bowie rejects the philosophy of music. He does so because it (allegedly) objectifies music and because it (allegedly) only ever affirms the practitioner’s prior philosophical assumptions. I argue that Bowie’s rejection is illegitimate on two counts. First, he mischaracterises the philosophy of music. I show how. Second, even if his characterisation of the philosophy of music were a faithful representation of that discipline, his reasons for rejecting it would still not be sufficient. In particular, Bowie criticises the philosophy of music for not engaging properly with its ‘other’ (music), yet refuses to engage seriously with his own ‘other’ (the philosophy of music). Bowie aims for the wrong target – and misses anyway.
Alperson, Philip. 1984. “On Musical Improvisation.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (1): 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/430189.
Bowie, Andrew. (1990) 2003. Aesthetics and Subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. 2nd edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bowie, Andrew. 2007. Music, Philosophy, and Modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bowie, Andrew. 2015. “The ‘Philosophy of Performance’ and the Performance of Philosophy.” Performance Philosophy 1: 51-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.21476/PP.2015.1131.
Currie, James. 2008. Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews: An Electronic Journal. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/23563/?id=13328.
Dammann, Guy. 2008. Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (4): 459-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayn036.
Davies, Stephen. 2012. The Artful Species: Aesthetics, Art, and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garratt, James. 2010. Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. Music & Letters 91 (3): 429-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcq027.
Goehr, Lydia. 2009. “Normativity without Norms.” Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4): 597-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00388.x.
Gracyk, Theodore. 1996. Rhythm and Noise: An Aesthetics of Rock. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Hagberg, Garry. 2009. “Jazz Improvisation and Ethical Interaction: A Sketch of the Connections.” In Art and Ethical Criticism, edited by Garry Hagberg, 258-85. Oxford: Blackwell.
Khalifa, Kareem. 2009. Review of Music, Philosophy, and Modernity, by Andrew Bowie. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3): 481-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.0.0127.
Kivy, Peter. 1993. The Fine Art of Repetition: Essays in the Philosophy of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kivy, Peter. 1995. Authenticities: Philosophical Reflections on Musical Performance. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Levinson, Jerrold. 1990. Music, Art, and Metaphysics: Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. Reprinted New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Levinson, Jerrold. 2012. “Popular Song as Moral Microcosm: Life Lessons from Jazz Standards.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 71: 51-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1358246112000264.
Ridley, Aaron. 2004. The Philosophy of Music: Theme and Variations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Robinson, Jenefer. 2005. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thom, Paul. 1993. For An Audience: A Philosophy of the Performing Arts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Zangwill, Nick. 2014. “Friends Reunited: Susan McClary and Musical Formalism.” The Musical Times (Winter): 63-69.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2015 Tomas McAuley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).