A ‘What If’ Exercise: On the institution of the art school
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2020.52287Keywords:
art school, institution, fictional institution, art educationAbstract
We are increasingly experiencing an antagonistic polarization within the art schools. This seems to reflect the contemporary socio-political atmosphere, ruled by inequalities and injustices, fuelled by a narrative of scarcity and competition and by a very broadly spread mistrust, when not aggression, towards the very idea of the institution. As a matter of fact, schools are one of the few institutions in the theatre field providing a space for such polarizing relationships: they provide a space for friction, for conflict even.
This paper approaches the theatre school as an institution and a thinking entity, in the attempt to explore the forms of agonism that it makes possible, and how they can support positive forms of polarization. It assumes the perspective that “we are the institution” and, by acknowledging the agency that each of us has within artistic institutions, suggests some ways of thinking and practicing theatre school otherwise.
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 1996. Mezzi senza fine. Note sulla politica. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri (English translation: 2000. Means Without End. Notes on Politics. Translated by Cesare Casarino and Vincenzo Binetti. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Athanasiou, Athena. 2016. “Performing the Institution, ‘as if it were Possible.’” In Former West: Art and the Contemporary After 1989. Edited by Maria Hlavajova and Simon Sheikh, 679–692. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
Blanga Gubbay, Daniel and Livia Andrea Piazza. 2016. “Fictional Institutions: On radical Imagination.” In Turn Turtle! Reenacting the Institute. Edited by Elke van Campenhout and Lilia Mestre, 40–48. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.
Bergman, Aeron, Alejandra Salinas, and Irena Boric. 2016. Forms of Education: Couldn’t Get a Sense of It. Zagreb: Institute for New Connotative Action Press.
Davida, Dena, Marc Provonost, Véronique Hudon, and Jane Gabriels, eds. 2018. Curating Live Arts: Critical Perspectives, Essays and Conversations on Theory and Practice. New York and Oxford: Berghahn. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04b29
Douglas, Mary. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Esche, Charles. 2007. How to Grow Possibility: The Potential Roles of Academies. Edited transcript of Charles Esche’s talk at the book launch of Air# Let’s suppose the Academy is a place for artists… Amsterdam: Amsterdam School of the Arts.
Franceschini, Silvia, ed. 2018. The Politics of Affinity: Experiments in Art, Education and the Social Sphere. Biella: Cittadellarte.
Fraser, Andrea. 2005. “From the Critique of Institutions to an Institution of Critique.” Artforum 44 (1): 278–285.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2015. The Burnout Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780
Graziano, Valeria. 2016. “Prefigurative Practices. Raw materials for a political positioning of art, leaving the avant-garde.” In Turn Turtle! Reenacting the Institute. Edited by Elke van Campenhout and Lilia Mestre, 158–174. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.
Kunst, Bojana. 2012. “The Project Horizon: On the Temporality of Making.” Maska, Performing Arts Journal XXVII: 149–150. Later published in Manifesta Journal around Curatorial Practices. Accessed November 3, 2019. https://www.manifestajournal.org/issues/regret-and-other-back-pages/project-horizon-temporality-making
Kunst, Bojana. 2014. Artist at Work. Proximity of Art and Capitalism. Arlesford: Zero Books.
Lacan, Jacques. 1973. Le séminaire. Livre XI. Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. Paris: Le Seuil.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 2017. “Deep in Admiration.” In Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene, Vol 2. Edited by Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing, Heather Anne Swanson, Elaine Gan, and Nils Bubandt, 15–22. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Malzacher, Florian, and Joanna Warsza, eds. 2017. Empty Stages, Crowded Flats: Performativity as curatorial strategy. Berlin: Alexander Verlag Berlin.
Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. London and New York: Routledge.
Mouffe, Chantal.2007. “Artistic Activism and Agonistic Spaces.” Art & Research. A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods 1 (2) (Summer): n.p. http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/mouffe.html
Mouffe, Chantal. 2013. “Institutions as Sites of Agonistic Interventions.” In Institutional Attitudes: Instituting Art in a Flat World. Edited by Pascal Gielen, 63–74. Amsterdam: Valiz.
Mouffe, Chantal. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London and New York: Verso.
Muraya, Ogutu. 2019. Facebook, July 27. Accessed on August 1, 2019. https://www.facebook.com/ogutu.muraya
O’Neill, Paul, Lucy Steeds, and Mick Wilson, eds. 2017. How Institutions Think: Between Contemporary Art and Curatorial Discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pasolini, Pier Paolo. 1964. Io sono una forza del passato in Poesia in forma di rosa. Milano: Garzanti.
Piazza, Livia Andrea. 2018. The Concept of the New. Framing Production and Value in Contemporary Performing Arts. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf04gv
Pomarico, Alessandra, ed. 2018. Pedagogy, Otherwise: The Reader. Udaipur: Ecoversities.
Rancière, Jacques. 1991. The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Schneider, Rebecca. 2011. Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852873
Solnit, Rebecca. 2005. A Field Guide to Getting Lost. New York: Penguin.
Stengers, Isabelle. 2011. A plea for slow science. Faculté de Philosophie et des Lettres, ULB, December 13.
Thorne, Sam. 2017. School: A Recent History of Self-Organized Art Education. Berlin and New York: Sternberg Press.
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World. On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873548
Vanhee, Sarah. 2017. ‘The Fantastic Institution’. Talk at The Fantastic Institution, Kunstencentrum BUDA, Kortijk, February 16. Accessed November 3, 2019. https://www.kunsten.be/dossiers/perspectief-kunstenaar/perspective-institution/4451-the-fantastic-institutions
Woolf, Virginia. 1929. A Room on One’s Own. London: Hogarth Press. Accessed November 3, 2019. https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/w/woolf/virginia/w91r/complete.html
Woolf, Virginia. 1938. Three Guineas. London: Hogarth Press. Accessed November 3, 2019. https://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/BPL_Images/Content_store/Sample_chapter/9780631177241/woolf.pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).