Imperceptible Bodies
Haptic counter-pleasures in the work of Marcelo Evelin
Abstract
In this article I investigate the choreographic practice and work of Marcelo Evelin as a specifically haptic mode of what Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari call becoming-imperceptible. In times where power dynamics become ever more supple and non-localisable, the notion of becoming-imperceptible is an apt conceptual figure in naming both the conditions of power as well their modes of resistance.
On this basis, I analyse Evelin’s practice of massa in its choreographic hapticality as a collective process of desubjectification, in which bodies become prismatic as they refract one another in a pluralistic field of agency.
I then turn to Evelin’s group piece, A Invenção da Maldade (2019), which, in my view (and among other things) expands this haptic and prismatic field to include the audience. By doing so, the piece can be said to engender what I call haptic space. Through an in-depth analysis of the work I argue that haptic space is an asignifying and appositional mode of co-existence that has the capacity to problematize contemporary forms of power by intensifying affect-ability and virtual tactility. Finally, I contemplate the psychosocial effects of the loss of haptic spaces during the Covid-19 pandemic.
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 2020. “The Invention of an Epidemic” and “Clarifications”. In “Coronavirus and philosophers. M. Foucault, G. Agamben, S. Benvenuto.” European Journal of Psychoanalysis 3: www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/coronavirus-and-philosophers. Accessed 3.11.20
Artaud, Antonin. 1981. The Theatre and its Double. Translated by Victor Corti. London: John Calder.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
Barad, Karen. 2012. ‘On Touching—the Inhuman That Therefore I Am’. Differences 23 (3): 206–23. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892943
Benvenuto, Sergio. 2020. “Forget about Agamben.” In “Coronavirus and philosophers. M. Foucault, G. Agamben, S. Benvenuto.” European Journal of Psychoanalysis 3: www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/coronavirus-and-philosophers. Accessed 3.11.20.
Beckman, Frida (ed.). 2018. Control Culture. Foucault and Deleuze after Discipline. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474436779
Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. Transpositions. On Nomadic Ethics. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Canetti, Elias. 1978. Crowds and Power. Translated by Carol Stewart. New York: Continuum.
Da Silva, Denise Ferreira. 2007. Toward a Global Idea of Race. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Da Silva, Denise Ferreira. 2014. “No-bodies: law, raciality and violence.” Meritum – Belo Horizonte 9 (1) (Jan./Jun.): 119-162.
Deleuze. Gilles. 1995. Negotiations 1972–1990. Translated by Martin Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze. Gilles. 2004. Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. Translated by Daniel W. Smith. New York and London: Continuum.
Deleuze. Gilles. 2006. Two Regimes of Madness. Text and Interviews 1975–1995, edited by David Lapoujade. Translated by Ames Hodges and Mike Taormina. Semiotext(e) / Foreing Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Deleuze. Gilles. 2013. Foucault. Translated by Seán Hand. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 2016. A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi. New York and London: Bloomsbury.
Döcker, Georg. 2020. “Digitale Logen, leere Stühle und chaotische Räume. Über Corona und Theater.” HAU3000 (April 2020): https://www.hebbel-am-ufer.de/en/hau3000/digitale-logen-leere-stuehle-und-chaotische-raeume. Accessed 3 November 2020.
Egert, Gerko. 2020. Moving Relation. Touch in Contemporary Dance. Translated by Rett Rossi. New York and London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030901
Egert, Gerko. 2022. “Operational Choreography. Dance and Logistical Capitalism.” Performance Philosophy 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2022.71305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2022.71305
Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage.
Foucault, Michel. 1996. Foucault Live: Collected Interviews (1961–1984), Edited by Sylvère Lotringer. Translated by Lysa Hochroth and John Johnston. New York: Semiotext(e).
Haraway, Donna. 2004. The Haraway Reader. New York and London: Routledge.
Harney, Stefano, and Fred Moten. 2013. The Undercommons. Fugitive Planning & Black Study. Wivenhoe: Minor Compositions.
Krenak, Ailton. 2020. Ideas to Postpone the End of the World. São Paolo: Companhia das Letras.
Lepecki, André. 2013. “Choreopolice and Choreopolitics. Or, the task of the dancer.” TDR/The Drama Review 57 (4): 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00300
Lepecki, André. 2016. Singularities: Dance in the Age of Performance. New York and London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694948
Manning, Erin. 2016. The Minor Gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jhg1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jhg1
Marks, Laura U. 2002. Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mohan, Shaj. 2020. “The Obscure Experience” (part of “Debates: Our Mysterious Being” by Jean-Luc Nancy and Shaj Mohan). The Philosophical Salon: A Los Angeles Review of Books Channel, 13 April. https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/our-mysterious-being/. Accessed 3 November 2020.
Moten, Fred. 2018. Stolen Life. Durham; NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372028
Patton, Paul. 2018. “Philosophy and Control.” In Control Culture. Foucault and Deleuze after Discipline, edited by Frida Beckman, 193-211. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474436779-014
Preciado, Paul B. 2020. “Learning from the Virus.” Translated by Molly Stevens. Artforum 58 (9). https://www.artforum.com/print/202005/paul-b-preciado-82823
Rouvroy, Antoinette. 2013. “The End(s) or Critique: Data-Behaviourism vs. Due-Process.” In Privacy, Due Process and the Computational Turn. Philosophers of Law Meet Philosophers of Technology, edited by Mireille Hildebrandt and Katja De Vries, 143-167. New York and London: Routledge.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jonas Schnor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
