Operational Choreography: Dance and logistical capitalism

Gerko Egert

doi:10.21476/PP.2022.71305

Authors

Gerko Egert Justus-Liebig-Universität, Gießen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4887-1548

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2022.71305

Keywords:

Choreography, logistics, logistical capitalism, operation, operational politics, Yvonne Rainer, Juli Reinartz, dance, choreopower

Abstract

The paper adresses dance in regard to logistical capitalism and its operational politics. Operational politics denotes the control of processes from their inside, regulated and modulated by their very own logic. Instead of subsuming processes to external regulators such as pregiven scripts, goals or acting and moving subjects, operational politics is based on the logic of process itself and its regulation via immanent techniques. In regard to movement, operational politics started to gain hold in the field of logistics in the 1960s. Over the last decades, these operational choreographies proliferated into all realms of society, creating a logistical regime that comprises modes of thinking as much as modes of existence and action. It governs the movements of economic production as much as the way we perceive, live and move. Dance – seen as a practice in which new modes of thinking, moving and acting as well as new forms of subjectivity are explored in a physical manner – became an integral part of this logistical regime: In dance, the logic of operations is exercised beyond the realm of business organization. The study of operational choreography in dance as it is proposed in the paper is therefore twofold: On the one hand, it offers an analysis of the modes of logistical power at work in performances. On the other hand, it reveals how performances investigate the logistical regime itself and its operational politics on a bodily level.

Author Biography

Gerko Egert, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Gießen

Gerko Egert is a performance studies scholar. He is currently postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Applied Theatre Studies, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen where he works on a project entitled “Choreopower. On the Politics of Movement”. His research deals with philosophies and politics of movement, human and non-human choreographies, dance and performance, process philosophy and (speculative) pragmatism, especially in the work of Deleuze and Guattari. Gerko holds a PhD from Freie Universität Berlin (published 2016, English transl. 2020). His publications include: “Choreographing the Weather – Weathering Choreography” (TDR 2016) and “Migration, Kontrolle und Choreomacht” [Migration, Control and Choreopower] (ARCH+ 2020). He is co-founder of Nocturne, a platform for experimental knowledge production (www.nocturne-plattform.de).

References

Chombart de Lauwe, Paul-Henry. 1952. Paris et l'agglomération parisienne. L'espace social dans une grande cité - Méthodes de recherches pour l'étude d'une grande cite. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Cowen, Deborah. 2014. The deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping violence in global trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816680870.001.0001

Cuppini, Niccolò, and Mattia Frapporti. 2018. “Logistics Genealogies: A Dialogue with Stefano Harney.” Social Text 36(3): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-6917802

Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. “Postscript on Control Societies.” Translated by Martin Joughin. In Negotiations 1972–1990, 177–182. New York: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, Gilles. 2006. Foucault. Translated by Seán Hand. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Egert, Gerko. Forthcoming. Choreopower. Choreography and the Politics of Movement.

Egert, Gerko. 2019. “Everyday Abstractions. Immediation and the Powers of Choreography.” In Immediation II, edited by Erin Manning, Anna Munster, and Bodil Marie Stavning Thomsen, 443–455. London: Open University Press.

Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage.

Franko, Mark. 2002. The Work of Dance: Labor, Movement, and Identity in the 1930s. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

Gilbreth, Frank B. 1921. Motion Study: A Method for Increasing the Efficiency of the Workman. New York: D. van Nostrand.

Goldman, Danielle. 2013. I want to be ready: Improvised dance as a practice of freedom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Gropius, Walter. 1968. “Theater Design.” In Apollo in the Democracy. The Cultural Obligation of the Architect, 153–163. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Guattari, Félix. 1987. “Cracks in the Street.” Translated by Anne Gibault and John Johntson. Flash Art: 82–85.

Guattari, Félix. 1995. Chaosmosis: An Ethico-Aesthetic Paradigm. Translated by Paul Bains and Julian Pefanis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Harney, Stefano, and Fred Moten. 2013. The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning & Black Study. Wivenhoe, UK: Minor Compositions.

Hölscher, Stefan. 2022. “Self or Group Technology? Ambiguities of the Workshop Format” Performance Philosophy 7 (1): https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2022.71306

Ivanova, Mirela, Joanna Bronowicka, Eva Kocher, and Anne Degner. 2018. The App as a Boss? Control and Autonomy in Application-Based Management. Frankfurt (Oder): Viadrina.

Manning, Erin, and Brian Massumi. 2014. Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679669.001.0001

Massumi, Brian. 2014. What Animals Teach Us about Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822376057

Massumi, Brian. 2015. Ontopower: War, Powers and the State of Perception. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375197

Mezzadra, Sandro and Brett Neilson. 2013. “Extraction, Logistics, Finance: Global Crisis and the Politics of Operations.” Radical Philosophy 178: 8–18.

Rainer, Yvonne. 1974. Work 1969–73. Halifax: Press of the Novia Scotia College of Art and Design.

Rainer, Yvonne. 2006. Feelings are Facts: A Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Reinartz, Juli. 2020. “Der perfekte Bankraub.“ In Experimente Lernen – Techniken tauschen, edited by Julia Bee and Gerko Egert, 209–231. Weimar: Nocturne.

Rossiter, Ned. 2016. Software, Infrastructure, Labor: A Media Theory of Logistical Nightmares. New York and London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203758113

Scheiber, Noam. 2017. “How Uber Uses Psychological Tricks to Push Its Drivers’ Buttons.” New York Times, April 2. Accessed December 11, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/02/technology/uber-drivers-psychological-tricks.html.

Schuh, Anne. 2019. "Having a Personal (Performance) Practice: Dance Artists' Everyday Work, Support, and Form." Dance Research Journal 51 (1): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0149767719000068

Simondon, Gilbert. 1992. “The Genesis of the Individual.” Translated by Mark Cohen and Sanford Kwinter. In Incorporations, edited by Jonathan Crary and Sanford Kwinter, 297–319. New York: Zone Books.

Simondon, Gilbert. 2015. “Culture and Technics.” Translated by Olivia Lucca Fraser, revised by Giovanni Menegalle. Radical Philosophy 189: 17–23.

Simondon, Gilbert. 2017. On the Modes of Existence of Technical Objects. Translated by Cecile Malaspina and John Rogove. Minneapolis: Univocal.

Vujanovic, Ana. 2017. “Performance Practice: Between Self-Production and Transindividuality.” In Performance und Praxis, edited by Gabriele Klein and Hanna Katharina Göbel, 295–312. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839432877-013

Taylor, Frederick W. 1998. The Principles of Scientific Management. Mineola and New York: Dover.

Tsing, Anna. 2009. “Supply Chains and the Human Condition.” Rethinking Marxism 21 (2): 148–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935690902743088