Self or Group Technology?
Ambiguities of the workshop format
Keywords:
performativity and theatricality, practice-as-researchAbstract
In my contribution to this volume I would like to investigate in how far the recent spread of the workshop format in the dance field in its difference from the formats of rehearsal, training, or showing can be contrasted with the historical emergence of the workshop in the Neo-Avantgardes of the 1960s and thereby situated in the area of conflict between group technologies and technologies of the self. I am doing so by relating my own current research project to Michel Foucault´s late investigation of ascesis and different kinds of subjectivity, to Richard Schechner´s approach to the workshop, and to the research Ana Vujanovi?, Bojana Cveji?, and Marta Popivoda have been conducting under the title Performing the Self in the last years. At the end of this essay I will briefly say a few sentences about the durational event Life Forms which took place at Haus der Kulturen der Welt (HKW) in Berlin from April 25 till 27 (2019), since this contemporary workshop-like setting very much reflected on what I would like to call the paradox of the workshop.
References
Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. New York: Verso.
Chiapello, Eve, and Luc Boltanski. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Verso.
Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, 208–228. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1997. “What is Enlightenment?” In Ethics: Subjectivity, and Truth, ed. Paul Rabinow, 303–320. New York: The New Press.
Foucault, Michel. 2005. The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982, edited by Frédéric Gros. Translated by Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Janevski, Ana, and Thomas J. Lax, eds. 2018. Judson Church Theatre : The Work is Never Done. New York: MoMA.
Lyotard, Jean-François. 2009. Enthusiasm: The Kantian Critique of History. Translated by Georges Van Den Abbeele. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Martin, Carol. 2006. “After Paradise: The Open Theatre´s The Serpent, Terminal, and The Mutation Show.” In Restaging the Sixties: Radical Theatres and their Legacies, edited by James Harding and Cindy Rosenthal, 79–105. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
McKenzie, Jon. 2001. Perform or Else: From Discipline to Performance. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420058
Palladini, Giulia. 2017. The Scene of Foreplay: Theater, Labor, and Leisure in 1960s New York. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv47w8w5
Ramsey, Margaret Hupp. 1991. The Grand Union (1970-1977): An Improvisational Performance Group. New York: Peter Lang.
Sarasin, Philipp. 2010. Foucault zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.
Schechner, Richard. 1988. Performance Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Stefan Hölscher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).