Dance, Philosophy, and Somaesthetics

Authors

  • Eric Mullis Queens University of Charlotte - USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2016.2136

Keywords:

philosophy, embodied research, somaesthetics

Abstract

This essay examines the question whether dance can do philosophy by considering the manner in which dance processes used in the studio can advance philosophical investigations of human embodiment.  Two contemporary improvisation techniques are discussed, Gaga technique developed by Ohad Naharin and Contact Improvisation developed by Steve Paxton.

Author Biography

Eric Mullis, Queens University of Charlotte - USA

Eric Mullis is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Queens University of Charlotte.  He has recently published essays in Dance Research Journal, Journal of Aesthetic Education, and The Pluralist. He is currently an MFA student in dance at the University of Wisconsin (Milwaukee) and is a founding member of The Triptych Collective, a performing arts group based in Charlotte, North Carolina (USA). ericmullis8.com

References

Albright, Ann Cooper. 2011. “Situated Dancing: Notes from Three Decades in Contact with Phenomenology.” Dance Research Journal 43 (2): 7–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0149767711000027

———. 1997. Choreographing Difference: The Body and Identity in Contemporary Dance. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

Alexander, Thomas. 1987. John Dewey's Theory of Art, Experience and Nature: The Horizons of Feeling. New York: State University of New York Press.

Aldor, Gaby. 2003. “The Borders of Contemporary Israeli Dance: ‘Invisible Unless in Final Pain.’” Dance Research Journal 35 (1): 81–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0149767700008780

Alterowitz, Gretchen. 2014. “Toward a Feminist Ballet Pedagogy: Teaching Strategies for Ballet Technique Classes in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Dance Education 14 (1): 8–17. http://dx.doi.org10.1080/15290824.2013.824579

Bordo, Susan. 2004. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Oakland: University of California Press.

———. 2000. The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and Private. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

Bunker, Jenny and Anna Pakes, Bonnie Rowell, eds. 2015. Thinking Through Dance: The Philosophy of Dance Performance Practices Oxford: Dance Books.

Dalton, Thomas. 2002. Becoming John Dewey: Dilemmas of a Philosopher and Naturalist. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Dewey, John. (1932) 2005. Art as Experience. New York: Perigree.

———. (1922) 2002. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Prometheus.

———. (1925) 1958. Experience and Nature. New York: Dover.

Foster, Susan Leigh. 2011. Choreographing Empathy: Kinesthesia in Performance. New York: Routledge.

———. 1998. “Choreographies of Gender.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 24 (1): 1–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/495316

Foucault, Michel. 2001. Power. Vol .3 of The Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by James Faubion. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: New Press.

Fraleigh, Sondra Horton. 1996. Dance and the Lived Body. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Green, Jill. 2003. “Foucault and the training of docile bodies in dance education.” Journal of the Arts and Learning Special Interest Group of the American Education Research Association 19 (1): 99–125.

Hall, Joshua M. 2012. “Choreographing the Borderline: Dancing With Kristeva.” Philosophy Today 56 (1): 49–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201256124

———. 2011. “Revalorized Black Embodiment: Dancing with Fanon.” Journal of Black Studies 42 (2): 127–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021934711419363

Nietzsche, Frederick. (1883) 1978. Thus Spoke Zarathustra, edited and translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Penguin.

Kozel, Susan. 2008. Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

LaMothe, Kimerer L. 2015. Why We Dance: A Philosophy of Bodily Becoming. Chicago: Columbia University Press.

McCormack, Derek P. 2014. Refrains for Moving Bodies: Experience and Experiment in Affective Spaces. Durham: Duke University Press.

Mcfee, Graham.1992. Understanding Dance. New York: Routledge.

Mullis, Eric. 2015. “The Pragmatist Yogi: Ancient and Contemporary Yogic Somaesthetics.” The Pluralist 10 (2): 205–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.5406/pluralist.10.2.0205

Naharin, Ohad. 2006. "Truth in Movement.” Dance Magazine 80 (10): 50–56.

Novack, Cynthia. 1990. Sharing the Dance: Contact Improvisation and American Culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Protopapa, Efrosini. 2013. “Choreography as Philosophy, or Exercising Thought in Performance.” In Thinking Through Dance: The Philosophy of Dance Performance Practices, edited by Jenny Bunker, Anna Pakes, and Bonnie Rowell, 118–135. Oxford: Dance Books.

Paxton, Steve. 1975. “Contact Improvisation.” TDR: The Drama Review 19 (1): 40–42.

Schmeig, Anthony. 2004. Watching Your Back: Chinese Martial Arts and Traditional Medicine. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Sheets-Johnston, Maxine. 2015. The Phenomenology of Dance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Singleton, Mark. 2010. Yoga Body: The Origins of Modern Posture Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shusterman, Richard. 2012. Thinking Through the Body: Essays in Somaesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2008. Body Consciousness: A Theory of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2000. Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

Summers-Bremner, Eluned. 2009. “Reading Irigaray, Dancing.” Hypatia 15 (1): 90–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2000.tb01081.x

Wartenberg, Thomas. 2006. “Beyond Mere Illustration: How Films can be Philosophy.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1): 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8529.2006.00226.x

Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Downloads

Published

29-07-2016

How to Cite

Mullis, E. (2016). Dance, Philosophy, and Somaesthetics. Performance Philosophy, 2(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2016.2136

Issue

Section

Articles