'Visibility brings with it responsibility': Using a Pragmatic Performance Approach to Explore a Political Philosophy of Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2017.3139Keywords:
Theatre technology, performance technology, pragmatism, instrumentalism, scenography, technology, technoculture, Genet, Merleau Ponty, Foucault, Multi-media, intermediality, visibilityAbstract
With the emergence, suspicion and social acceptance of ubiquitous communications technology thoroughly plumbed and the digital age already wondering what it is going to rename itself in light of ever more fluid and complex technologies, this paper asks: what can theatre and performance provide to the production of a political philosophy of technology? Using the work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Michel Foucault and an analysis of a recent inter-cultural adaptation of Jean Genet's The Maids, this study examines the politics of visible theatre technologies in performance and offers a pragmatic, or instrumentalist, approach to developing a political philosophy of technology.
References
Auslander, Philip. 1999. Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. London: Routledge.
Barba, Eugenio. and Phillip Zarrilli. 1988. ‘Eugenio Barba to Phillip Zarrilli: About the Visible and the Invisible in the Theatre and about ISTA in particular.’ Theatre Drama Review 32 (3): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1145900
Bay-Cheng, Sarah, Chiel Kattenbelt, Andy Lavender, and Robin Nelson, eds. 2010. Mapping Intermediality in Performance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Birringer, Johannes. 1998. Media & Performanc: Along the Border. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bowie, Andrew. 2015. “The ‘Philosophy of Performance’ and the ‘Performance of Philosophy’.” Performance Philosophy 1: 51–58. https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2015.1131
Braun, Bruce. 2004. ‘Nature and Culture: On the Career of a False Problem.’ In A Companion to Cultural Geography, edited by James S. Duncan, Nuala C. Johnson and Richard H. Schein, 151–179. London: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470996515.ch11
D’Arcy, G. 2013. ‘The Yellow Sound an unstageable composition? Technology, modernism and spaces that should-not-be.’ Body, Space, Technology 12. http://people.brunel.ac.uk/bst/vol12/geraintdarcy/geraintdarcy.pdf
Causey, Matthew. 2004. Theatre and Performance in Digital Culture: From Simulation to Embeddedness. London: Routledge.
Dixon, Steve. 2009. Digital performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 1997. The Show and the Gaze of Theatre: A European Perspective. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
Feenberg, Andrew. 1999. Questioning Technology. London: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin.
Foucault. Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Taylor and Francis.
Garrety, Karin and Richard Badham. 2004 ‘User-Centred Design and the Normative Poltitics of Technology.’ Science, Technology, & Human Interventions 29 (2): 191–212.
Giannachi, Gabriella. 2004. Virtual Theatres: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
Goffman, Erving. 1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Hickmann, Larry A. 2001. Philosophical Tools for a Technological Culture: Putting Pragmatism to Work. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Idhe, Don. 2004. ‘Has the Philosophy of Technology Arrived? A State-of-the-Art Review.’ Philosophy of Science 71 (1): 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1086/381417
Jensen, Amy Petersen. 2007. Theatre in a Media Culture: Production, Performance and Perception Since 1970. Jefferson: McFarland & Co.
Kim, Sunhee. 2015. ‘Playing the Maids public promo.’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stWcbtqN6kQ
Kirkkipelto, Esa. 2015. “For what do we need Performance Philosophy?” Performance Philosophy 1: 4–6. https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2015.117
Kozel, Susan. 2007. Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lacan, Jacques. 1994. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Pyscho-analysis. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin.
Llanarth Group, Gaitkrash, and Theatre P’yut. 2015. Playing ‘the Maids’. Programme Notes. Cardiff: Chapter Arts Centre.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
O’Reilly, Kaite and Adrian Curtin. 2015. ‘Intercultural Dramaturgy.’ Exeunt, February 17. Accessed June 29, 2015. http://exeuntmagazine.com/features/playing-the-maids-intercultural-dramaturgy/.
Phelan, Peggy. (1993) 2001. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge.
Pucciani, Oreste F. 1963. ‘Tragedy, Genet and The Maids.’ The Tulane Review 7 (3): 42–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/1125083
Reinelt, Janelle. 1994. ‘Staging the Invisible: The Crisis of Visibility in Theatrical Tepresentation.’ Text and Performance Quarterly 14 (2): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939409366075
Sinfield, Alan. 1990. ‘Theatre and Politics.’ In Encyclopedia of Literature and Criticism, edited by Martin Coyle, Peter Garside, Malcolm Kelsall, and John Peck, 475–487. London: Routledge..
Sørenson, K. H. 2004. ‘Cultural Politics of Technology: Combining Critical and Constructive Interventions?’ Science, Technology, & Human Interventions 29 (2): 184–190.
Winner, Langdon. 1993. ‘Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding it Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology.’ Science, Technology, & Human Values 18.3: 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800306
Zarrilli, Phillip. 1988. ‘For Whom is the “Invisible” Not Visible?: Reflections on Representation in the work of Eugenio Barba.’ Theatre Drama Review 32 (1): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/1145872
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
