Autofictions in Co-labouring
Abstract
In this co-authored text, the Dissonant Co-Labouring Key Group examines the difficulties, gaps, political slippages and entanglements of collaboration in its encounter with artistic and educational institutions. Engaging autofiction as a scholarly mode with different models of co-authorship, the Key Group move through critical engagements with working conditions, temporalities of labour and its instrumentalisation within and beyond universities and cultural ecologies. Dialoguing with a plurality of voices and registers, the text invokes adjacent and overlapping temporalities of working together, attends to different modalities of critical thought and collapses the distinction between the fictive and the real.
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2022. Complaint! Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
Arora, Swati. 2021. ‘A Manifesto to Decentre Theatre and Performance Studies.’ Studies in Theatre and Performance 40 (1): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2021.1881730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2021.1881730
Bhattacharya, Gargi. 2023. We, The Heartbroken. London: Hajar Press.
brown, adrienne maree. 2021. Holding Change: The Way of Emergent Strategy Facilitation and Mediation. Chico, CA: AK Press.
Federici, Silvia. 2019. Re-Enchanting the World: Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
Fisher, Mark. 2010. Capital Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester: Zero Books.
Fournier, Lauren. 2022. Autothoery as Feminist Practice in Art, Writing and Criticism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13573.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13573.001.0001
Glissant, Édouard. 1997. Poetics of Relation. Translated by Betsy Wing. Ann Arbour: The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10257
Gotman, Kélina. 2021. ‘The Inappropriable: On Oikology, Care, and Writing Life.’ SubStance 50 (1): 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2021.0006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2021.0006
Harvie, Jen. 2019. ‘Institutional Celebration’ in Agency: A Partial History of Live Art, edited by Theron Schmidt, 175–180. Bristol and London: Intellect and Live Art Development Agency.
Joseph, Miranda. 2002. Against the Romance of Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kunst, Bojana. 2015. Artist at Work: Proximity of Art and Capitalism. Winchester: Zero Books.
Linsley, Johanna. 2013. Dreams for an Institution: A Study Room Guide on engaging & challenging institutions. London: Live Art Development Agency.
Lorey, Isabell. 2015. State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious. London: Verso.
Lorey, Isabell. 2017. ‘Becoming common: precarization as political constituting.’ E-flux Journal, 17. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/17/67385/becoming-common-precarization-as-political-constituting/.
Mignolo, Walter. 2023. “The Colonial Matrix of Power.” In Talking About Global Inequality: Personal Experiences and Historical Perspectives, edited by Christian Olaf Christiansen, Mélanie Lindbjerg Machado-Guichon, Sofía Mercader, Oliver Bugge Hunt, and Priyanka Jha, 39–46. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08042-5_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08042-5_5
Preciado, Paul B. 2020. ‘Learning from the Virus.’ Translated by Molly Stevens. Artforum 58 (9). https://www.artforum.com/print/202005/paul-b-preciado-82823.
Puar, Jasbir K. 2017. The Right to Main: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372530
Radynski, Oleksiy. 2022. ‘The Case Against the Russian Federation.’ ¬E-flux journal, 125. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/125/453868/the-case-against-the-russian-federation/.
Readings, Bill. 1997. The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1cbn3kn. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1cbn3kn
Ridout, Nicholas. 2013. Passionate Amateurs: Theatre, Communism, and Love. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gk08bn. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gk08bn
Riley, Charlotte Lydia. 2023. Imperial Island: A History of Empire in Modern Britain. London: Penguin/Random House. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674296923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674296923
Solga, Kim. 2019. ‘Editorial: Theatre & performance, crisis & survival.’ Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 24 (3), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2019.1619451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2019.1619451
Steyerl, Hito. 2011. ‘In Free Fall: A Thought Experiment on Vertical Perspective.’ E-flux Journal, 24. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/24/67860/in-free-fall-a-thought-experiment-on-vertical-perspective/.
Tan, Jack Ky. 2022. ‘Budget commission.’ Performing borders, 2 (‘Rallying the commons’). https://performingborders.live/ejournal/budget-commission/.
Virno, Paolo. 2004. A Grammar of the Multitude. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Diana Damian Martin, Daniela Perazzo, Nik Wakefield

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided it is for non-commercial uses; and that lets others excerpt, translate, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).