Beuys’ Chair and the Violence of the Other: Toward a Theory of Aesth-ethics

Dror Pimentel

Abstract


Most rare are those works of art that, in a simple visual gesture, succeed in formulating a dilemma that occupies culture as a whole. Such is the artwork of Joseph Beuys entitled Fat Chair. The work—viewed mainly from a phenomenological perspective—is comprised of two elements holding a tension: a chair on the one hand, and a lump of fat placed on top of it on the other. The tension between these elements, so the article argues, manifests the tension between two types of violence: following Benjamin, these are termed “the violence of the Father” and “the violence of the Other” (or in Hebrew, “the Violence of ha-Rav”). The violence of the Father refers mainly to the violence of culture: the violence of the concept and the category from the side of the object, and the violence of the law/name of the Father from the side of the subject. The violence of the Other, transgressing distinctions between good and evil and subject and object, is the violence of the pre-cultural and the primordial, before law and language. This primal violence cannot appear in its full presence, either in culture in general or in art in particular; it can only appear as a leftover and a spectre. Beuys' artwork manifests this aporetic appearance in a paradigmatic manner, and in this sense, it could serve as a paradigm for the possibility of hospitality in art. In fact, the article opens the way for an argument of a larger scale, according to which art, and not the social sphere—as Levinas maintains—should be viewed as the sphere of the  hospitality of the entirely Other. The study of such hospitality in art should therefore be termed “Aesth-ethics.”


Keywords


Beuys; violence; hospitality; phenomenology;aesthetics; ethics;

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Bataille, George. 2013. Story of the eye. Translated by Joachim Neugroschel. London: Penguin.

Benjamin, Walter. 1986. ‘Critique of violence. In Reflections: Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings, edited by Peter Demetz, translated by Edmund Jephcott, 277–300. New York: Schocken.

Derrida, Jacques. 1982. ‘Différance’. In Margins of philosophy, translated by Alan Bass. 1–27. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Derrida, Jacques. 1992. ‘Force of law: The “mystical foundation of authority”.’ In Deconstruction and the possibility of justice, edited by Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David G. Carlson, 3–67. New York and London: Routledge.

Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx: The state of debt, the work of mourning and the new international. Translated by Peggy Kamuf. New York and London: Routledge.

Freud, Sigmund. 1950. Totem and taboo. Translated by James Strachey. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Heidegger, Martin. (1942/1943) 1982. Parmenides, Gesamtausgabe, 54. Frankfurt a. M: V. Klostermann.

Kant, Immanuel (1783) 2004. Prolegomena to Any future metaphysics: That will be able to come forward as science. Translated by Gary Hatfield. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808517

Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.

Lacan, Jacques. 1992. The seminar of Jacques Lacan: The ethics of psychoanalysis, 1959–1960 Book VII. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller. Translated by Dennis Porter. London: Routledge.

Lacan, Jacques. 1993. The seminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud’s papers on technique, 1953–1954 Book I. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller. Translated by John Forrester. New York and London: W. W. Norton.

Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Ecrits:‎ The first complete edition in English. Translated by Bruce Fink, Héloįse Fink and Russell Grigg. New York: W.W. Norton.

Lauf, Cornelia. 1992. Joseph Beuys: The pedagogue as persona. Ph D diss., Columbia University.

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1979. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. ‘Reality and its shadow.’ In Collected philosophical papers, translated by Alphonso Lingis, 1–15. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4364-3_1

Taylor, Mark C. 2012. Refiguring the spiritual: Beuys, Barney, Turrell, Goldsworthy. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/tayl15766

Tisdall, Caroline. 1998. Joseph Beuys: We go this way. London: Violette Editions.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21476/PP.2017.3173

Copyright (c) 2017 Dror Pimentel

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.